Showing posts with label drinks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drinks. Show all posts

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Biomimetic Investigation of Coffee Flavor: A Wake Up Call for Reductionism


Food science tends to take a reductionist approach to evaluating complex foodstuffs, analyzing individual components and extrapolating the results to obtain a comprehensive, if somewhat artificial, understanding of the entire product. However, as is true for other scientific enterprises as well, this can result in an obscured impression of reality. For this reason, many scientists strive to develop experiments that allow them to probe as realistic a simulation as possible. In regards to biologically oriented fields, the term “biomimetics” has been coined to encapsulate such technologies. In their article investigating the aromatic profile of roasted coffee beans, Poisson et al employ biomimetic “in-bean” experiments to gain a more accurate understanding of the formation of odorant molecules during roasting (article abstract). Although previous studies have investigated flavor formation in coffee, the vast majority of these have been conducted using vastly simplified model systems that may not accurately reflect the normal processes occurring inside coffee beans. Studies comparing the flavor profiles of beans roasted whole to those ground before roasting have demonstrated the indispensability of the whole bean environment to normal flavor formation.

Poisson et al utilize a relatively new approach to circumvent the insufficiencies faced by experiments based on model systems. They extract the flavor-precursor molecules from unroasted, green coffee beans by soaking them in hot water. The beans can then be reconstituted either with the natural bean extract or with synthetic “biomimetic” solutions containing the most likely principle precursors to coffee bean flavor molecules (as suggested by experiments in model systems). The reconstitution step allows the scientists to intervene and alter the composition of the replenishing extract, so that they can trace the result of various precursors after the “spiked” beans have been roasted. By controlling the types of precursors present in the unroasted beans, the scientists can determine the effect of the presence or absence of particular precursors on the formation of various flavor molecules upon roasting.


The procedure also enables the to spike the beans with isotope-labeled precursors, which contain carbon-13 (heavier than the more abundant carbon-12 – see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope for more information on isotopes). Upon roasting, these carbon-13 labeled precursors are incorporated into odorant molecules, and can be identified using mass spectrometry (a technique that identifies molecules based on their masses – therefore if the mass is greater than expected for the compound containing only carbon-12, the difference between the expected and experimental value tells you how many carbon-13 atoms were incorporated). Therefore, if exhausted green coffee beans are spiked with only a particular labeled precursor, the scientists can trace which odorant molecules contain the carbon-13 isotopes (and can also identify the number of isotopes, and therefore the number of precursors incorporated). Such a determination of the fate of various precursors provides significant insight into the mechanism of formation of these odorant molecules during roasting.

Through use of this in-bean approach, Poisson et al were able to confirm many of the formation pathways proposed based on model systems. However this method also revealed a variety of alternative pathways that had not been suggested due to simplification in these models. Unlike previous experiments, the in-bean experiments allowed researchers to maintain the complexity of the coffee bean, and thus did not eliminate molecules that could be potentially important contributors to mechanisms of flavor formation. Though the researchers feel that improvements to this method are still necessary (optimization of the reconstituting mixture and reconstitution efficiency, for example), they stress the importance of biomimetic techniques in determining the nature of reactions that occur during food processing of any kind. This type of approach is analogous to in vivo studies in biomedical research, which are seen as an imperative step toward gaining a full understanding of biological processes. Food science must adopt such a standard, as in order to obtain the most accurate and informative results, studies of food processing and cooking must be performed under conditions as authentic as possible.

Poisson, L.;Schmalzried, F.; Davidek, T.; Blank, I.; Kerler, J. Study on the Role of Precursors in Coffee Flavor Formation Using In-Bean Experiments. J. Agric. Food Chem., [Online] 2009, 57 (21), 9923–9931. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jf901683v (accessed November 15, 2009).

Posted by Picasa

Monday, October 26, 2009

A Little Bubbly

It is well known among champagne connoisseurs that you can tell the quality of the product by the nature of its bubbles (http://www.ehow.com/how_2192062_tell-good-champagne-its-bubbles.html). The flute should be adorned with a dainty pearl necklace of delicate effervescence. But what exactly determines the character of these bubbles? The rate at which they are formed and their longevity are both dependent upon the composition of the adsorption layer at the liquid/air interface. This adsorption layer is simply the aggregation of molecules on the surface of the champagne. It is known that the adsorption layer consists primarily of macromolecules (macromolecules include proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and nucleic acids), but its specific composition remains unclear. However, Aguié-Béghin et. al. (appropriately from the Université de Reims Champagne Ardennes) report their preliminary findings on the chemical composition of the adsorption layer in champagne (which they produced in the lab—I wonder if there would be a market for that…). The article abstract can be found here.

The researchers relied primarily on three methods of investigation for this study. First, they performed ellipsiometry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipsometry) allowing them to determine the amount of time required for an adsorption layer to form. They used Brewster Angle Microscopy (BAM - http://users.otenet.gr/~garof/Bam/) to visualize the interface of champagne adsorbed onto a polystyrene surface, as a model for the liquid/air interface. Finally, the group performed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) studies to determine the chemical composition of the champagne surface (again as modeled by application of a champagne layer to polystyrene). XPS utilizes high-energy X-rays to disrupt electrons from the surface, and the energy needed to cause these electrons to escape is characteristic of the particular elements and the way in which they are bonded (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_photoelectron_spectroscopy).

Ellipsiometry was used to compare the rate of formation of the adsorption layer of champagnes at significantly different concentrations. The most highly concentrated (i.e. the sample containing the most macromolecules per unit volume of liquid) formed an adsorption layer the fastest, suggesting that these macromolecules do in fact play an important role in the formation of this surface layer.

Samples of champagne on the polystyrene layer were prepared in three different ways (soaking in champagne, soaking followed by rinsing with water, applying a layer of champagne and allowing it to evaporate), and visualized using BAM. The images demonstrate that the adsorption layer is heterogeneous, with regions showing aggregation of macromolecules in organized structural forms known as domains. This is consistent with previous findings at the liquid/air interface of champagne, and gives credence to the use of the polystyrene layer as a model for the liquid/air interface.

The XPS data reveal the ratios of different elements in the surface layer, and also provide some insight into the functional groups present in the macromolecules. Upon comparison with the composition of typical proteins, polysaccharides (i.e. sugars), and lipids (i.e. fats), the group was able to support the suggestion that the adsorption layer of champagne is composed primarily of proteins and polysaccharides, in the ratio of 35% protein to 65% polysaccharide. The data suggest that lipids are not present in the surface layer in any great quantity, which is atypical for many food products and biochemical mixtures, where lipids usually have a tendency to aggregate on the surface.

The specific identities of these proteins and polysaccharides, as well as the role that each plays at the champagne/air interface and thus in the formation and stability of bubbles, remains to be elucidated. However, these results do give some insight into the make up of the adsorption layer, and point to particular targets for further analysis. I’ll drink to that – Salut!

Aguié-Béghin, V.; Adriaensen, Y.; Péron, N.; Valade, M.; Rouxhet, P.; Douillard, R. Sturcture and Chemical Composition of Layers Adsorbed at Interfaces with Champagne. J. Agric. Food Chem. [Online early access]. DOI:10.1021/jf9016948. Published Online: October 8, 2009. http://pubs.acs.org/journal/jafcau (accessed October 23, 2009).

Posted by Picasa